Mosque schoosting attacks for dummies. Recognise the facial features? Not withstanding the fact that the dummy has no arms! This is not Brenton Tarrant the alleged Christchurch Mosques attacker being arrested here. This clown show like the fake video is embarrassingly bad and a joke. So much wrong here. The purported Gunman BRENTON TARRANT had TWO DIFFERENT vehicles. Both belonged to the NZ SECURITY INTELLIGENCE SERVICE, so it was inextricably an INSIDE JOB ....... multiple levels of players and liars embroidered upon the tapestry background crime scape of what in essence constituted a highly sophisticated elaborate deception and fraud ....... CLICK ON IMAGE for a very detailed video analysis including run down on freely available REPLICA TOY GUNS (Twink not included) used in the so called 'attacks' ....... A Commission of Enquiry which has been set up to supposedly Investigate what supposedly happened in the lead up to the supposed attacks on the ides of 15 March 2019, will represent a fence between the reality and the Official narrative being a corrosive deleterious invariable contrived Whitewash.

Monday, 11 November 2019

Two Public Enquiries at Odds over the need for shutting out the Public

In New Zealand, there are at least two major enquiries into security/defence issues running in parallel at the moment, and the one that’s demonstrating more transparency and candour is not the one that you’d expect. Surprisingly, it has been the Royal Commission of Enquiry into the Christchurch mosque shootings that has been proceeding under a cloak of the utmost secrecy. This Enquiry was set up to inform the public about the operational priorities and competence of our Police and Security Services in the wake of the alleged worst mass murder in New Zealand history. The best way of informing them, it has been decided, is to deny them access to the proceedings. Which stemming from a supposed Democracy being absolutely diabolical hypocritical and contemptuous. Every aspect of the Royal Commission’s work has been conducted behind closed doors while the state spends up large on its own contingents of lawyers. State agencies also have been forbidden to publish what they said, or submitted, to the Enquiry. Those people and Non Governmental Organisations who testify cannot discuss their evidence, even with other like minded agencies.
At the end of this process in December, the public will apparently be expected to swallow whatever findings however unpalatable and biased they be based on the decisions the enquiry has reached via its own selective reasoning, in support of and upholding the Official Narrative. It reflects the reality that a lot of this is a discussion between people with power and does not instill any confidence in the due process's involvement and manner of investigation.
A Royal Commission of Enquiry spokeswoman has defended the need for secrecy on the grounds that this was required to make sure that government agencies could answer direct and probing questions without restriction and under urgency. Which does not explain why the public can’t be allowed a passive presence, to hear what questions are being asked, and what answers are being given.
To date another enquiry, the Operation Burnham Enquiry hasn’t exactly been a model of transparency either as it has gone about its investigation of the actions of the New Zealand Defence Force in Afghanistan, as alleged by Nicky Hager and Jon Stephenson in their book Hit & Run. Basically this public hearing will focus on the extent, cause and context of the civilian casualties that the New Zealand Defence Force initially, and comprehensively, denied had ever taken place. Incredibly, the New Zealand Defence Force will face (limited) cross examination in public on this matter. The hearing will take place in Wellington, from Monday September 16 until Friday September 20. By proceeding in this fashion,the Operation Burnham enquiry is lifting the very cloak of secrecy that the Royal Commission of Enquiry into the Christchurch mosque shootings claims to be so essential. Evidently, the Burnham enquiry believes the public has an over-riding interest in being able to hear direct and probing questions being put, and the answers being offered to them. To repeat: one official enquiry is claiming that closed hearings are necessary so that probing questions can be asked out of public earshot while the other official enquiry is claiming that probing questions can and should take place in a relatively open hearing, to better serve the public good. Only one of them is right. So is there any good news out there concerning this kind of exercise? Yes there is and it is coming from an unlikely quarter. Advice, at a price. As Radio New Zealand has revealed the numbers of communications “advisers” employed by the government keeps multiplying, long after they began to outnumber journalists by grotesque ratios of at least seven to one, the last time it was observed. Taxpayers keep paying these advisers at salary levels that are rising at rates well in excess of the average rate of wage inflation. Reportedly in some agencies, communications salaries above $100,000 annually are routine even though that annualised figure may be questionable in some cases, given the high prevalence of short term contracts. Unfortunately, the Iron Law of spin doctoring is that the more p.r. people you hire, the less amount of genuine information gets out. Which obviously is the intent and hardly surprising.
One of the prime purposes is to control the messaging.
To be fair, this trend may be inevitable. Certainly, the rise of the departmental/ministerial spin doctors can be read as a symptom of how a supposedly neutral public service has been subordinated to the political demands of ministerial messaging. It is that, but there’s more to the story. As silo’ed decision making recedes and cross-departmental policies become the norm, woe betide any procedures that neglect any of the stakeholders deemed essential by each participating ministry or department. That’s one reason for the apparent stasis, because the same basic message has to be subjected to its own tweaking and/or rewrites by the various advisers who represent the corners of each empire of stakeholders who might conceivably be affected by the policy proposal in question. Neglect any of them fail to consult or ignore their input at your peril. That’s one reason why the output of so many, emerges so slowly. Meanwhile, the clock keeps ticking on the circa $100-120 hourly rate.

Saturday, 9 November 2019

Royals in NZ to Prop Up Failing Christchurch Fake Mosque Attacks Official Narrative

Image result for prince charles christchurch mosque attacks images 
Prince Chuck and Camilla Parker Bowles Who He tows around are both adulterers
And a pair of bludgers
What You hear a lot of today is "My partner."
Or "I was married".
There is no such thing as a partner
A Woman is either married or She is not        
If She is a virgin She is not married
According to the Laws of YAHWAH ELOHEEM God
Marriage is not consummated through the signing of a piece of paper
But through the sexual act of intercourse
When the two flesh's become one
The first Man a Woman has sex with is Her husband for Life
There is no such thing as divorce
Unless until death Us do part
If this Woman now has sex with another man She is an adulteress
If in fact She had had no sex with another partner previous to this
Which in this case She already would be
A Man can have more than one wife
Provided of course She is not already married
But a woman can have only one husband
If a Man now has sex with a Woman who is married He is an adulterer
Adultery is sin unto 'the' Death
For those who have failed the course

Revelation 21:8  “But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.” 

Only ELOHEEM come under the Law
Who are Judged by YAHWAH according to His Laws
Which being put into the "second death" may or may not necessarily be the outcome
King David was an adulterer and a murderer
As opposed to the creation to which it will prove fatal
But We do need to change Our ways.

Romans 2:12 
“For as many as have sinned without law shall also perish without law: and as many as have sinned in the law shall be judged by the law;”

 Bed case
PICTURE ABOVE: He's in pretty good shape for someone who has been "shot multiple times" with an AR-15. If he had been shot multiple times, and had somehow survived, it's unlikely he would be lying in a hospital bed dressed in those clothes. One might also expect him to have medical equipment monitoring his condition. Once again, the injuries to this man and his daughter (assuming, for the sake of argument, that there were injuries) are explicable only if they were caused by a low-powered weapon such as an air rifle. Incidentally, the CBC Radio report mentioned in the paragraph below says Wasseem "took [only?] a bullet to the hip". 

PICTURE BELOW: CBC Radio reported on April 15, 2019, that Wasseim Alsati (sic) took his daughter Alen to Al Noor Mosque on March 15, "But before they even got inside...both father and daughter were shot and left for dead...The shooter had aimed his automatic rifle at the little girl's head, but her father scooped her up and shielded her. She took a bullet to the stomach and another to her toes." There are two problems here: (1) The alleged shooter's "live-stream" shows no such incident, and (2) A bullet from a real AR-15 to the stomach would have caused such horrific injuries (see the surgical testimony in the next section), one has to wonder whether survival would have been possible for such a small child. See an earlier picture of Alen

Alen Alsati in hospital bed 
It was initially assumed the above picture was taken at Starship Hospital in Auckland. But my understanding, at the time of writing this caption (September 1, 2019), is that the hospital has no record of Alen (whose name is also spelled "Elin") being admitted — despite media reports of her being flown to Auckland with life-threatening injuries. The information I have is that she was admitted to Christchurch Hospital on March 15, and discharged at 4.20am on March 16. Her father, whose full name may be Waseem Alsati Daragmeh, was apparently admitted to Christchurch Hospital on March 15, and discharged at 6.40pm on March 17. My understanding is that, on March 15, he was working as a barber and did not go to the mosque at any time. According to Greg Hallett, who is the source of much of this information, Alsati is also a Jordanian agent.  
Image result for greg hallett Crimechurch Charity Fraud images
Image result for Crimechurch Charity Fraud images
Come in at O:14:2O (Full Screen)

 Flowers at the gate of the Al Noor mosque in Christchurch today.

Friday, 8 November 2019

PASSENGER STEAMER "TEL AVIV" - the Transfer (Havaara) Agreement

Related image

Thursday, 7 November 2019

How the Kremlin Was Hidden From Nazi Bombs

Moscow. August 1941. Guarding Moscow's air space. The Radio-Technical Troops of the Soviet Air Defense Force are intended to conduct air reconnaissance

Moscow's Red Square in June 1941

Wednesday, 6 November 2019

Elijah the Prophet and the Man - Bertrand Comparet Podcast[b].mp3